11th Circuit Rejects Second Amendment Challenge to Federal Machine Gun Ban

By /

Bad news out of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals: they've just slammed the door on a Second Amendment challenge to the federal machine gun ban, ruling that full-auto firearms and conversion devices like auto-sears aren't protected by our sacred right to keep and bear arms. In a decision that's sure to rile up every freedom-loving gun owner, the court upheld the conviction of a Florida man for possessing an auto-sear—a tiny piece of metal that turns a standard AR-15 into a machine gun. This comes post-New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the landmark 2022 Supreme Court case that was supposed to make gun grabbers sweat. But apparently, not in Atlanta.

Gavel striking down on a machine gun silhouette with Second Amendment text overlay

The Case: One Man's Fight Against the NFA

Let's break it down. The defendant, a Florida resident we'll call "John Doe" for this post (real name in the ruling: United States v. Roe), got pinched by the ATF for having an auto-sear. These devices, often called "drops" or "lightning links," are cheap, easy to make, and extremely effective at bumping a semi-automatic rifle into full-auto territory. Under the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 and the Firearm Owners' Protection Act (FOPA) of 1986, new machine guns for civilians are verboten. You can own pre-1986 transfers if you're rich enough (we're talking $20K-$50K a pop), but good luck finding one.

Doe argued that the outright ban violates the Second Amendment as interpreted by Bruen. The Supreme Court in Bruen ditched the old "interest-balancing" tests that let judges play God with our rights. Instead, regulations must be "consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation." Doe said machine guns are "arms" and the ban doesn't pass muster historically.

The 11th Circuit? Not buying it. In a 2-1 decision penned by Judge Jill Pryor (Clinton appointee), they said machine guns aren't "in common use today" for self-defense—a key phrase from District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). Since MGs aren't your everyday carry at the range or home, they're outside 2A protection altogether. No need to dig into history. Case closed. Conviction affirmed.

Post-Bruen Chaos: Courts Twist the Test

Bruen was a game-changer. Justice Thomas laid it out: Text, history, and tradition. If it's an "arm" in "common use," it's protected. Regs must analogize to 1791 or 1868 traditions. But lower courts are mangling it. The 11th Circuit here skips straight to "common use" as a gatekeeper, ignoring whether machine guns are "arms" at all.

Pro-2A scholars like the Firearms Policy Coalition and lawyers at the Second Amendment Foundation are fuming. Judge Adalberto Jordan's dissent nailed it: The majority's approach is "textually and historically unsound." Machine guns are "bearable arms." History shows rapid-fire weapons like the Gatling gun (Civil War era) and even repeating rifles were known. The 1934 NFA was a knee-jerk reaction to gangsters, not some deep tradition.

Supreme Court justices with Bruen decision book and American flag in background

And here's the circular logic that burns me up: Bans make things "uncommon," then courts use that rarity to justify more bans. It's like saying, "No one uses horse-drawn carriages, so we can ban them." Full-auto fire is a legitimate tool for self-defense against multiple threats—think home invasions or riots. Suppressors, SBRs, and other NFA items are legal(ish) because they're in "common use" among the suppressor-loving crowd. Why not MGs?

Why This Ruling Sucks for All Gun Owners

  1. Slippery Slope Supreme: If machine guns are out because they're not "common," what's next? AR-15s? "Assault weapons" are owned by millions but called "uncommon" by antis. Standard capacity mags? Seen this movie before.
  2. ATF Overreach Ignored: Auto-sears are "firearms" per ATF, but they're not even serialized most times. This ruling blesses the bump stock flip-flop and forced reset trigger nonsense.
  3. No Historical Analog: The court admits no 1791 tradition banning MGs (duh, they didn't exist), but waves it away. Dissent points to Revolutionary War-era volley guns and multi-barrel repeaters.
  4. Civilian Utility: Pre-ban MGs are safe, reliable, and fun. Hollywood myths aside, they're not "weapons of war" beyond what our founders bore (flintlocks were military tech too).

This isn't just about machine guns—it's about the government deciding what you can own based on their feelings. The 11th Circuit joins a circuit split (5th Circuit is more friendly post-Rahimi), teeing up SCOTUS review. Fingers crossed for cert.

What Can You Do? Fight Back!

Don't just gripe—act. Here's your pro-2A battle plan:

  • Support the Challengers: Donate to FPC, SAF, or GOA. They're funding appeals.
  • Contact Congress: Push for repeal of the Hughes Amendment (the 1986 ban). HR 335 is floating around.
  • Buy NFA Legal: Get a tax stamp for a suppressor or SBR. Show "common use" in action.
  • Vote and Volunteer: NRA, USCCA—get involved locally.
  • Stay Informed: Follow GunStuff.tv for updates. Share this post!

The Second Amendment isn't a suggestion—it's the law of the land. This ruling is a setback, but we've overturned worse (Heller, McDonald, Bruen). The founders didn't mince words: Arms for the people, period. Machine guns today, your favorite rifle tomorrow. Stay armed, stay vigilant, and keep fighting.

Patriotic eagle with machine gun and Don't Tread on Me flag

Stay frosty, patriots. Molon labe.

Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

References

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top